The Supreme Court considered whether a commercial building undergoing redevelopment had to be valued, for the purposes of business rates, as if it were still a useable office. On the valuation date, various major building elements had been removed. These included the air conditioning system, electrical wiring, sanitary fittings and most of the ceiling tiles.
The Local Government Finance Act 1988 provides that, where non-domestic property is vacant, the rateable value of the property is based on the amount of annual rent reasonably obtainable for the property, on the assumption that before the tenancy commences the property is in a state of reasonable repair, but excluding any repairs that a reasonable landlord would consider to be uneconomic.
The court held that where a property is undergoing redevelopment and incapable of occupation, the assumption of repair did not displace the principle of reality. In this instance, the property was not capable of occupation due to the redevelopment works and the rating list was entitled to be amended. The Court of Appeal’s earlier judgment was overturned.
Those owning and developing vacant commercial premises will be pleased with the Supreme Court’s decision in this case, which will give the property owning developer good grounds for avoiding liability for the business rates on the premises for the term of the development.
For further information relating to the points raised in this article, please contact Rob Cooke or a member of the Property Disputes Team. For legal advice on other Commercial Property matters, contact our specialist team of Commercial Property Lawyers
Please note this information is provided by way of example and may not be complete and is certainly not intended to constitute legal advice. You should take bespoke advice for your circumstances.