Going through a divorce or separation is often cited as one of the most stressful events someone can go through and is all consuming for those involved. Therefore, it is understandable why people turn to social media to vent frustrations, share details, send messages and post comments in the heat of the moment without much thought of the consequences. It is, of course, all too easy to reach for your phone, post exactly what is on your mind and within seconds your friends and connections can see.
The problem is that social media activity can have a significant impact on family proceedings. As a general rule, social media posts are admissible as evidence in the Family Court. They can be used as evidence to advance numerous arguments including evidence of one party’s character, the adulterous relationship, the existence of a new partner, extravagant spending, abusive behaviour or even drug use. These issues can have an impact on financial proceedings and children cases.
For example, if one party is posting on social media photographs of the cruise they have been on and the meal out at the fancy Michelin star restaurant, it is going to be difficult to argue that they are suffering financial hardship and need the financial support from the other party. Photographs may also be used as evidence to show the existence of a new relationship with a wealthy partner or of a night out drinking which may also have bearing on the outcome of a case.
In any event, social media posts have the propensity to add fuel to the fire of already difficult circumstances and often muddy the water resulting in arguments becoming protracted and therefore wasting time and costs.
Social media posts can also result in legal action in their own right. In the case of Stocker v Stocker  EWCA Civ 170 (UKSC 2018/0045), the husband and wife divorced acrimoniously in 2012 following a 13 year marriage. There was an exchange of posts and comments on Facebook, on the wall of the husband’s new partner which included the wife posting that her Husband had “tried to strangle” her . The husband commenced libel proceedings because of these comments, which could be viewed by any of his partner’s friends. Following a trial, the Judge found that the wife’s comments were defamatory. The decision was then upheld by the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal. We will have to wait the outcome of this appeal.
Whilst the best advice is not to post anything on social media that relates to an issue that could be raised in family cases, if you do, here are our top tips:
If you would like to speak to a member of the team regarding any of the issues raised in this article, or any other family law matter please feel free to contact: Chris Burns, who is the head of our family law department; Sophie Arrowsmith a member of our team in the Leeds office Richard Buckley who is a member of the team in the Sheffield office or Andrew Smith who is a member of our York office.
Please note this information is provided by way of example and may not be complete and is certainly not intended to constitute legal advice. You should take bespoke advice for your circumstances.